Do we have a national definition of “clean energy.” For example, do you consider atomic fission as promoted in the Clean Energy Bank of the proposed ACESA law as “clean.” Do you favor the expansion of the limited fossil fuel, natural gas, for electric services over the coming decades as a solution to carbon contamination? Is there a disconnect between CAP policy, such as silence on nuclear and promotion of “low carbon” initiatives rather than “no carbon” solutions? Do you think we can solve one contamination issue by substituting other contaminants, such as spending hundreds of billions on nuclear or fossil gas electric plants? What are the prospects for economical solar, wind, and conservation measures as we develop these over the next decade while we internalize or suffer the costs of carbon and radionuclide contamination?