<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Multiplies Biomed Stimulus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceprogress.org/2009/02/senate-multiplies-biomed-stimulus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2009/02/senate-multiplies-biomed-stimulus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bruggeman</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2009/02/senate-multiplies-biomed-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-4245</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bruggeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=1421#comment-4245</guid>
		<description>Exactly how is a temporary boost in funding supposed to stabilize an agency?  Seriously.  How will this not repeat the problems biomedicine faced after the last large boost in funding without some sign that the community won&#039;t act like they have a free line of credit to hire and build to their hearts content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly how is a temporary boost in funding supposed to stabilize an agency?  Seriously.  How will this not repeat the problems biomedicine faced after the last large boost in funding without some sign that the community won&#8217;t act like they have a free line of credit to hire and build to their hearts content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

