http://scienceprogress.org/2008/10/state-stem-cell-policies-deserve-national-attention/ Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://scienceprogress.org/2008/10/state-stem-cell-policies-deserve-national-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-3138 Cathy Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:27:15 +0000 http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/10/state-stem-cell-policies-deserve-national-attention/#comment-3138 I was surprised to read in the New York Times that scientists feel equally comfortable with both presidential candidates.I wondered what happened to the stem cell issue or creationism and even pollution standards in their assessment of the issue. I was surprised to read in the New York Times that scientists feel equally comfortable with both presidential candidates.I wondered what happened to the stem cell issue or creationism and even pollution standards in their assessment of the issue.

]]> http://scienceprogress.org/2008/10/state-stem-cell-policies-deserve-national-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-3132 Tom Nichols Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:25:17 +0000 http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/10/state-stem-cell-policies-deserve-national-attention/#comment-3132 We have been arguing the same thing for quite awhile. States currently have a patchwork approach because of a lack of leadership in the executive level of our Government, hopefully this will change on January 20th 0f 2009. This patchwork has put a stranglehold on Embryonic stem cell research since 2001. It is truly absurd the way this has worked out. We have been arguing the same thing for quite awhile. States currently have a patchwork approach because of a lack of leadership in the executive level of our Government, hopefully this will change on January 20th 0f 2009. This patchwork has put a stranglehold on Embryonic stem cell research since 2001. It is truly absurd the way this has worked out.

]]>