<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biofuels vs. Fuel: Don&#8217;t Get Lost in the Maze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceprogress.org/2008/04/biofuels-vs-fuel-dont-get-lost-in-the-maze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2008/04/biofuels-vs-fuel-dont-get-lost-in-the-maze/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon Severdia</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2008/04/biofuels-vs-fuel-dont-get-lost-in-the-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon Severdia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/04/biofuels-vs-fuel-dont-get-lost-in-the-maze/#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Where the disentangling needs to happen is between the causes that we can do nothing about (drought, demand) and the causes which are consequences of deliberate policy decisions (biofuel mandates, ag protectionism).  I think conflating these two sets of causes stokes a brooding fatalism that lets inept policymakers tiptoe away from responsibility for their tragic mistakes.  Their idiotic and self/constituent serving behavior is the common denominator to both biofuel policies so wrong the backlash now threatens legitimate technologies coming down the pipeline, and to an overarching agricultural policy that contributes to myriad other problems, the greatest of which is starvation in countries that cannot compete with first world subsidized agriculture.  The way forward is complicated, but if we don&#039;t hold policymakers&#039; feet to the fire for their blunders, the situation will never improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the disentangling needs to happen is between the causes that we can do nothing about (drought, demand) and the causes which are consequences of deliberate policy decisions (biofuel mandates, ag protectionism).  I think conflating these two sets of causes stokes a brooding fatalism that lets inept policymakers tiptoe away from responsibility for their tragic mistakes.  Their idiotic and self/constituent serving behavior is the common denominator to both biofuel policies so wrong the backlash now threatens legitimate technologies coming down the pipeline, and to an overarching agricultural policy that contributes to myriad other problems, the greatest of which is starvation in countries that cannot compete with first world subsidized agriculture.  The way forward is complicated, but if we don&#8217;t hold policymakers&#8217; feet to the fire for their blunders, the situation will never improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

