<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloned Livestock Is OK for Food, Says FDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceprogress.org/2008/01/cloned-livestock-is-ok-for-food-says-fda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2008/01/cloned-livestock-is-ok-for-food-says-fda/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2008/01/cloned-livestock-is-ok-for-food-says-fda/comment-page-1/#comment-7036</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/01/cloned-livestock-is-ok-for-food-says-fda/#comment-7036</guid>
		<description>The FDA is full of lies and deception.  Probably paid off by the industries they support.  FDA only did one study that said that the product was good opposed to the many others that states and showed otherwise.  99% of cloned cattle failed.  The information is out there.  CFS would be the place to get it and expose the FDA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDA is full of lies and deception.  Probably paid off by the industries they support.  FDA only did one study that said that the product was good opposed to the many others that states and showed otherwise.  99% of cloned cattle failed.  The information is out there.  CFS would be the place to get it and expose the FDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Pentland</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2008/01/cloned-livestock-is-ok-for-food-says-fda/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>William Pentland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/01/cloned-livestock-is-ok-for-food-says-fda/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Why aren&#039;t reporters doing their homework?  This is the third time this cloned livestock story has appeared in the mainstream media and, like the previous two, it fails to connect the cloned livestock fiasco with the National Animal ID System.  Regardless of how safe or dangerous cloned livestock ultimately prove to be, small farmers and consumers who buy organic food have already paid dearly so that Big Beef can sell cloned milk and meat products.  This story is also about perhaps the most explosive issue in rural farming communities today. The FDA approved cloned livestock and the USDA destroyed organic farms and farmers to make sure the FDA could do it.  This story deserves the full work out.  I tried giving it one, but nobody seemed to notice --http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071231/pentland_gumpert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why aren&#8217;t reporters doing their homework?  This is the third time this cloned livestock story has appeared in the mainstream media and, like the previous two, it fails to connect the cloned livestock fiasco with the National Animal ID System.  Regardless of how safe or dangerous cloned livestock ultimately prove to be, small farmers and consumers who buy organic food have already paid dearly so that Big Beef can sell cloned milk and meat products.  This story is also about perhaps the most explosive issue in rural farming communities today. The FDA approved cloned livestock and the USDA destroyed organic farms and farmers to make sure the FDA could do it.  This story deserves the full work out.  I tried giving it one, but nobody seemed to notice &#8211;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071231/pentland_gumpert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

