<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snap Observations: Labor-HHS Veto, One Laptop Per Child, Rewarding Drug Development, &#8220;Right to Dry&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceprogress.org/2007/11/snap-observations-labor-hhs-veto-one-laptop-per-child-rewarding-drug-development-right-to-dry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/11/snap-observations-labor-hhs-veto-one-laptop-per-child-rewarding-drug-development-right-to-dry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Plemmons Pratt</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/11/snap-observations-labor-hhs-veto-one-laptop-per-child-rewarding-drug-development-right-to-dry/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Plemmons Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/11/snap-observations-labor-hhs-veto-one-laptop-per-child-rewarding-drug-development-right-to-dry/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction, Gavin. I&#039;ve amended the entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction, Gavin. I&#8217;ve amended the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Baker</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/11/snap-observations-labor-hhs-veto-one-laptop-per-child-rewarding-drug-development-right-to-dry/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/11/snap-observations-labor-hhs-veto-one-laptop-per-child-rewarding-drug-development-right-to-dry/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>A clarification: The NIH mandate in the Labor-HHS bill has nothing to do with publishing, per se. NIH grantees would still be free to publish wherever they like, and there would be no interference with any editorial processes (such as peer review). The condition solely requires that grantees, after publication, deposit a copy of their article in PubMed Central. This is called self-archiving (&quot;green&quot; open access), and is agnostic on the subject of open access publishing (&quot;gold&quot; open access -- journals that are &quot;born&quot; free).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A clarification: The NIH mandate in the Labor-HHS bill has nothing to do with publishing, per se. NIH grantees would still be free to publish wherever they like, and there would be no interference with any editorial processes (such as peer review). The condition solely requires that grantees, after publication, deposit a copy of their article in PubMed Central. This is called self-archiving (&#8220;green&#8221; open access), and is agnostic on the subject of open access publishing (&#8220;gold&#8221; open access &#8212; journals that are &#8220;born&#8221; free).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

