<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain Tech is Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: teatree</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-6689</link>
		<dc:creator>teatree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-6689</guid>
		<description>The promise that such advances in brain technologies have for medicine are not in doubt, and ethical discussions to regulate the discoveries are indeed needed. 

I think that Carole Smith as well as Dr. Nick Begich have done excellent work to altert the public of the downside that advances in neuro-techologies have to society and individuals. With every advancement in the neuroscience for health, the military perhaps has already found it and exploited it for different purposes. These expolitations have gone on without oversight, and this fact is perhaps underreported. Military veterans suffering brain injuries have not benefited in significant ways from military nor medical research into neuro-technology, as the goals of such military research seem geared towards other ends. That is unfortuante.

Regulations of these technological developments, and ethical considerations regarding the uses of them calls for congressional bodies to study what the military has discovered, and this requires effort.

The following addresses this: 

http://mentalthreats.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The promise that such advances in brain technologies have for medicine are not in doubt, and ethical discussions to regulate the discoveries are indeed needed. </p>
<p>I think that Carole Smith as well as Dr. Nick Begich have done excellent work to altert the public of the downside that advances in neuro-techologies have to society and individuals. With every advancement in the neuroscience for health, the military perhaps has already found it and exploited it for different purposes. These expolitations have gone on without oversight, and this fact is perhaps underreported. Military veterans suffering brain injuries have not benefited in significant ways from military nor medical research into neuro-technology, as the goals of such military research seem geared towards other ends. That is unfortuante.</p>
<p>Regulations of these technological developments, and ethical considerations regarding the uses of them calls for congressional bodies to study what the military has discovered, and this requires effort.</p>
<p>The following addresses this: </p>
<p><a href="http://mentalthreats.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://mentalthreats.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Military’s Effort to Undercut Sovereignty of Mind &#171; The Military and Neuroscience</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-6688</link>
		<dc:creator>The Military’s Effort to Undercut Sovereignty of Mind &#171; The Military and Neuroscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-6688</guid>
		<description>[...] F. Brain Tech is Here, by Zack Lynch: http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] F. Brain Tech is Here, by Zack Lynch: <a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/ " rel="nofollow">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/ </a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOG knives</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>SOG knives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SOG knives...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting ideas... I wonder how the Hollywood media would portray this?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SOG knives&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting ideas&#8230; I wonder how the Hollywood media would portray this?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eric...&lt;/strong&gt;

I never thought about it that way....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eric&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I never thought about it that way&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack...&lt;/strong&gt;

I appreciate your effort and the quality of the information you provide. I certainly will folow these recommendations!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I appreciate your effort and the quality of the information you provide. I certainly will folow these recommendations!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celia</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is great and all, but what of the negative qualities neurotechnology may have?
It is impossible that neurotechnology will have no faults. The article only describes one side of the story-not both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is great and all, but what of the negative qualities neurotechnology may have?<br />
It is impossible that neurotechnology will have no faults. The article only describes one side of the story-not both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muscle injury</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>muscle injury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;muscle injury...&lt;/strong&gt;

However, research has shown that whey protein is oxidized (burned up) as much as it is used for protein synthesis, which means that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>muscle injury&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>However, research has shown that whey protein is oxidized (burned up) as much as it is used for protein synthesis, which means that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Duncan</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Well done. Yes, there are many treatments out there for most of these illnesses but the start up companies are not getting the funding they deserve. From my research it is obvious that the discovers and cures will pose a problem to various weapons systems in development and lower their effectiveness. Thanks for sharing these statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. Yes, there are many treatments out there for most of these illnesses but the start up companies are not getting the funding they deserve. From my research it is obvious that the discovers and cures will pose a problem to various weapons systems in development and lower their effectiveness. Thanks for sharing these statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carole Smith</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Dear Zack

What a utopia you describe. 
But for everyone of those illnesses  you list - Alzheimer’s disease, addiction, anxiety, autism, depression, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, obesity, Parkinson’s disease, pain, sensory disorders, spinal cord injury, stroke, schizophrenia, sleep disorders, and traumatic brain injury. as well as cancer -  hundreds or thousands of innocent citizens have been targeted for experimental research  carried out remotely to protect the researcher. Many programmes seek a  cure using reverse engineering, whereby the symptoms or illness are artificially manufactured, by destroying the hippocampus and therefore  memory , with beamed microwaves,  in order   to study Alzheimer&#039;s.   And the neurotech industries have sanctioned it,  exploited government secrecy, and sacrificed lives as well as brains,  to make their names and their  fortunes out of their  innocent victims.

I think this statement by the Air Force Directorate should be widely read and assessed when  this brilliant new society is invoked And as you well know,  there have  been   unheralded  advances in Neuroscience since 1996. 

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/vistas.htm

US  Air Force Scientific Advisory Board   (1996)

 http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/vistas.htm. (0.25 seconds) 


New World Vistas Air and Space Power for the 21st Century Summary ...

&quot;Prior to the mid-21st century, there will be a virtual explosion of knowledge in the field of neuroscience. We will have achieved a clear understanding of how the human brain works, how it really controls the various functions of the body, and how it can be manipulated (both positively and negatively). One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscle movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set. This will open the door for the development of some novel capabilities that can be used in armed conflict, in terrorist/hostage situations, and in training. New weapons that offer the opportunity of control of an adversary without resorting to a lethal solution or to collateral casualties can be developed around this concept. This would offer significant improvements in the capabilities of our special operation forces. Initial experimentation should be focused on the interaction of electromagnetic energy and the neuromuscular junctions involved in voluntary muscle control. Theories need to be developed, modeled, and tested in experimental preparations. Early testing using in vitro cell cultures of neural networks could provide focus for more definitive intact animal testing. If successful, one could envision a weapon that would render an opponent incapable of taking any meaningful action involving higher motor skills, (e.g. using weapons, operating tracking systems). The prospect of a weapon to accomplish this when targeted against an individual target is reasonable; the prospect of a weapon effective against a massed force would seem to be more remote. Use of such a device in an enclosed area against multiple targets (hostage situation) may be more difficult than an individual target system, but probably feasible.

It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction. When a high power microwave pulse in the gigahertz range strikes the human body, a very small temperature perturbation occurs. This is associated with a sudden expansion of the slightly heated tissue. This expansion is fast enough to produce an acoustic wave. If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus, it may be possible to &quot;talk&quot; to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Zack</p>
<p>What a utopia you describe.<br />
But for everyone of those illnesses  you list &#8211; Alzheimer’s disease, addiction, anxiety, autism, depression, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, obesity, Parkinson’s disease, pain, sensory disorders, spinal cord injury, stroke, schizophrenia, sleep disorders, and traumatic brain injury. as well as cancer &#8211;  hundreds or thousands of innocent citizens have been targeted for experimental research  carried out remotely to protect the researcher. Many programmes seek a  cure using reverse engineering, whereby the symptoms or illness are artificially manufactured, by destroying the hippocampus and therefore  memory , with beamed microwaves,  in order   to study Alzheimer&#8217;s.   And the neurotech industries have sanctioned it,  exploited government secrecy, and sacrificed lives as well as brains,  to make their names and their  fortunes out of their  innocent victims.</p>
<p>I think this statement by the Air Force Directorate should be widely read and assessed when  this brilliant new society is invoked And as you well know,  there have  been   unheralded  advances in Neuroscience since 1996. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/vistas.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/vistas.htm</a></p>
<p>US  Air Force Scientific Advisory Board   (1996)</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/vistas.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/vistas.htm</a>. (0.25 seconds) </p>
<p>New World Vistas Air and Space Power for the 21st Century Summary &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Prior to the mid-21st century, there will be a virtual explosion of knowledge in the field of neuroscience. We will have achieved a clear understanding of how the human brain works, how it really controls the various functions of the body, and how it can be manipulated (both positively and negatively). One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscle movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set. This will open the door for the development of some novel capabilities that can be used in armed conflict, in terrorist/hostage situations, and in training. New weapons that offer the opportunity of control of an adversary without resorting to a lethal solution or to collateral casualties can be developed around this concept. This would offer significant improvements in the capabilities of our special operation forces. Initial experimentation should be focused on the interaction of electromagnetic energy and the neuromuscular junctions involved in voluntary muscle control. Theories need to be developed, modeled, and tested in experimental preparations. Early testing using in vitro cell cultures of neural networks could provide focus for more definitive intact animal testing. If successful, one could envision a weapon that would render an opponent incapable of taking any meaningful action involving higher motor skills, (e.g. using weapons, operating tracking systems). The prospect of a weapon to accomplish this when targeted against an individual target is reasonable; the prospect of a weapon effective against a massed force would seem to be more remote. Use of such a device in an enclosed area against multiple targets (hostage situation) may be more difficult than an individual target system, but probably feasible.</p>
<p>It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction. When a high power microwave pulse in the gigahertz range strikes the human body, a very small temperature perturbation occurs. This is associated with a sudden expansion of the slightly heated tissue. This expansion is fast enough to produce an acoustic wave. If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus, it may be possible to &#8220;talk&#8221; to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Toomey</title>
		<link>http://scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Toomey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2007/10/brain-tech-is-here/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Excellent article! I would love to see someone actually step up and make the changes needed to support initiatives to help neuroscience advance. Cudos to you for being a part of it. Hopefully the right people will take notice of your foresight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article! I would love to see someone actually step up and make the changes needed to support initiatives to help neuroscience advance. Cudos to you for being a part of it. Hopefully the right people will take notice of your foresight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

